Section: Logical Reasoning
24)
Forty years ago, hardly anybody thought about going to court to sue somebody. A person could bump a pedestrian with his Chrysler Airflow and the victim would say something like, "No harm done," and walk away. Ipso facto. No filing of codicils, taking of depositions or polling the jury. Attorneys need not apply.
Which one of the following details, if true, would most strengthen the above statement?
-
-
-
-
-
Explanation
This fact would strengthen the merely impressionistic evidence that lawsuits were less prevalent 40 years ago. It is the only choice dealing directly with the implied subject of the passage - lawsuits.
This question is provided by
Barrons Educational Series.
Don't have time to finish?
Enter your email address and we'll send you a link to continue your exam.